Network Working Group
D. Levi
Request for Comments: 3413
Nortel Networks
STD: 62
P. Meyer
Obsoletes: 2573 Secure
Computing Corporation
Category: Standards Track
B. Stewart
Retired
December 2002


Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Applications

Status of this Memo

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

This document describes five types of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) applications which make use of an SNMP engine as described in STD 62, RFC 3411. The types of application described are Command Generators, Command Responders, Notification Originators, Notification Receivers, and Proxy Forwarders.

This document also defines Management Information Base (MIB) modules for specifying targets of management operations, for notification filtering, and for proxy forwarding. This document obsoletes RFC 2573.

Table of Contents

1 Overview ............................................... 2
1.1 Command Generator Applications ......................... 3
1.2 Command Responder Applications ......................... 3
1.3 Notification Originator Applications ................... 3
1.4 Notification Receiver Applications ..................... 3
1.5 Proxy Forwarder Applications ........................... 4
2 Management Targets ..................................... 5
3 Elements Of Procedure .................................. 6
3.1 Command Generator Applications ......................... 6
3.2 Command Responder Applications ......................... 9
3.3 Notification Originator Applications ................... 14
3.4 Notification Receiver Applications ..................... 17
3.5 Proxy Forwarder Applications ........................... 19 3.5.1 Request Forwarding ..................................... 21


Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 1]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


   3.5.1.1 Processing an Incoming Request .........................   21
   3.5.1.2 Processing an Incoming Response ........................   24
   3.5.1.3 Processing an Incoming Internal-Class PDU ..............   25
   3.5.2   Notification Forwarding ................................   26
   4       The Structure of the MIB Modules .......................   29
   4.1     The Management Target MIB Module .......................   29
   4.1.1   Tag Lists .....................,........................   29
   4.1.2   Definitions ..................,.........................   30
   4.2     The Notification MIB Module ............................   44
   4.2.1   Definitions ............................................   44
   4.3     The Proxy MIB Module ...................................   56
   4.3.1   Definitions ............................................   57
   5       Identification of Management Targets in
           Notification Originators ...............................   63
   6       Notification Filtering .................................   64
   7       Management Target Translation in
           Proxy Forwarder Applications ...........................   65
   7.1     Management Target Translation for
           Request Forwarding .....................................   65
   7.2     Management Target Translation for
           Notification Forwarding ................................   66
   8       Intellectual Property ..................................   67
   9       Acknowledgments ........................................   67
   10      Security Considerations ................................   69
   11      References .............................................   69
   A.      Trap Configuration Example .............................   71
           Editors' Addresses .....................................   73
           Full Copyright Statement ...............................   74

1. Overview

This document describes five types of SNMP applications:

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 2]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Note that there are no restrictions on which types of applications may be associated with a particular SNMP engine. For example, a single SNMP engine may, in fact, be associated with both command generator and command responder applications.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

1.1. Command Generator Applications

A command generator application initiates SNMP Read-Class and/or Write-Class requests, and processes responses to requests which it generated.

1.2. Command Responder Applications

A command responder application receives SNMP Read-Class and/or Write-Class requests destined for the local system as indicated by the fact that the contextEngineID in the received request is equal to that of the local engine through which the request was received. The command responder application will perform the appropriate protocol operation, using access control, and will generate a response message to be sent to the request's originator.

1.3. Notification Originator Applications

A notification originator application conceptually monitors a system for particular events or conditions, and generates Notification-Class messages based on these events or conditions. A notification originator must have a mechanism for determining where to send messages, and what SNMP version and security parameters to use when sending messages. A mechanism and MIB module for this purpose is provided in this document. Note that Notification-Class PDUs generated by a notification originator may be either Confirmed-Class or Unconfirmed-Class PDU types.

1.4. Notification Receiver Applications

A notification receiver application listens for notification messages, and generates response messages when a message containing a Confirmed-Class PDU is received.









Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 3]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


1.5. Proxy Forwarder Applications

A proxy forwarder application forwards SNMP messages. Note that implementation of a proxy forwarder application is optional. The sections describing proxy (3.5, 4.3, and 7) may be skipped for implementations that do not include a proxy forwarder application.

The term "proxy" has historically been used very loosely, with multiple different meanings. These different meanings include (among others):

  1. the forwarding of SNMP requests to other SNMP entities without regard for what managed object types are being accessed; for example, in order to forward an SNMP request from one transport domain to another, or to translate SNMP requests of one version into SNMP requests of another version;

  2. the translation of SNMP requests into operations of some non-SNMP management protocol; and

  3. support for aggregated managed objects where the value of one managed object instance depends upon the values of multiple other (remote) items of management information.

Each of these scenarios can be advantageous; for example, support for aggregation of management information can significantly reduce the bandwidth requirements of large-scale management activities.

However, using a single term to cover multiple different scenarios causes confusion.

To avoid such confusion, this document uses the term "proxy" with a much more tightly defined meaning. The term "proxy" is used in this document to refer to a proxy forwarder application which forwards either SNMP messages without regard for what managed objects are contained within those messages. This definition is most closely related to the first definition above. Note, however, that in the SNMP architecture [RFC3411], a proxy forwarder is actually an application, and need not be associated with what is traditionally thought of as an SNMP agent.

Specifically, the distinction between a traditional SNMP agent and a proxy forwarder application is simple:








Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 4]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Thus, when a proxy forwarder application forwards a request or notification for a particular contextEngineID / contextName pair, not only is the information on how to forward the request specifically associated with that context, but the proxy forwarder application has no need of a detailed definition of a MIB view (since the proxy forwarder application forwards the request irrespective of the managed object types).

In contrast, a command responder application must have the detailed definition of the MIB view, and even if it needs to issue requests to other entities, via SNMP or otherwise, that need is dependent on the individual managed object instances being accessed (i.e., not only on the context).

Note that it is a design goal of a proxy forwarder application to act as an intermediary between the endpoints of a transaction. In particular, when forwarding Confirmed Notification-Class messages, the associated response is forwarded when it is received from the target to which the Notification-Class message was forwarded, rather than generating a response immediately when the Notification-Class message is received.

2. Management Targets

Some types of applications (notification generators and proxy forwarders in particular) require a mechanism for determining where and how to send generated messages. This document provides a mechanism and MIB module for this purpose. The set of information that describes where and how to send a message is called a 'Management Target', and consists of two kinds of information:

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 5]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


The SNMP-TARGET-MIB module described later in this document contains one table for each of these types of information. There can be a many-to-many relationship in the MIB between these two types of information. That is, there may be multiple transport endpoints associated with a particular set of SNMP parameters, or a particular transport endpoint may be associated with several sets of SNMP parameters.

3. Elements Of Procedure

The following sections describe the procedures followed by each type of application when generating messages for transmission or when processing received messages. Applications communicate with the Dispatcher using the abstract service interfaces defined in [RFC3411].

3.1. Command Generator Applications

A command generator initiates an SNMP request by calling the Dispatcher using the following abstract service interface:

statusInformation =
-- sendPduHandle if success



-- errorIndication if failure

sendPdu(


IN
transportDomain
-- transport domain to be used

IN
transportAddress
-- destination network address

IN
messageProcessingModel
-- typically, SNMP version

IN
securityModel
-- Security Model to use

IN
securityName
-- on behalf of this principal

IN
securityLevel
-- Level of Security requested

IN
contextEngineID
-- data from/at this entity

IN
contextName
-- data from/in this context

IN
pduVersion
-- the version of the PDU

IN
PDU
-- SNMP Protocol Data Unit

IN
expectResponse
)
-- TRUE or FALSE

Where:

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 6]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


The result of the sendPdu interface indicates whether the PDU was successfully sent. If it was successfully sent, the returned value will be a sendPduHandle. The command generator should store the sendPduHandle so that it can correlate a response to the original request.

The Dispatcher is responsible for delivering the response to a particular request to the correct command generator application. The abstract service interface used is:

processResponsePdu(
-- process Response PDU

IN
messageProcessingModel
-- typically, SNMP version

IN
securityModel
-- Security Model in use

IN
securityName
-- on behalf of this principal

IN
securityLevel
-- Level of Security

IN
contextEngineID
-- data from/at this SNMP entity

IN
contextName
-- data from/in this context

IN
pduVersion
-- the version of the PDU

IN
PDU
-- SNMP Protocol Data Unit

IN
statusInformation
-- success or errorIndication

IN
sendPduHandle
)
-- handle from sendPdu





Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 7]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Where:

The procedure when a command generator receives a message is as follows:

  1. If the received values of messageProcessingModel, securityModel, securityName, contextEngineID, contextName, and pduVersion are not all equal to the values used in the original request, the response is discarded.

  2. The operation type, request-id, error-status, error-index, and variable-bindings are extracted from the PDU and saved. If the request-id is not equal to the value used in the original request, the response is discarded.

  3. At this point, it is up to the application to take an appropriate action. The specific action is implementation dependent. If the statusInformation indicates that the request failed, an appropriate action might be to attempt to transmit the request again, or to notify the person operating the application that a failure occurred.





Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 8]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


3.2. Command Responder Applications

Before a command responder application can process messages, it must first associate itself with an SNMP engine. The abstract service interface used for this purpose is:

statusInformation =
registerContextEngineID(
-- success or errorIndication
IN contextEngineID
-- take responsibility for this one
IN pduType
)
-- the pduType(s) to be registered

Where:

Note that if another command responder application is already registered with an SNMP engine, any further attempts to register with the same contextEngineID and pduType will be denied. This implies that separate command responder applications could register separately for the various pdu types. However, in practice this is undesirable, and only a single command responder application should be registered with an SNMP engine at any given time.

A command responder application can disassociate with an SNMP engine using the following abstract service interface:

unregisterContextEngineID(

IN contextEngineID
-- give up responsibility for this one
IN pduType
)
-- the pduType(s) to be unregistered

Where:

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 9]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Once the command responder has registered with the SNMP engine, it waits to receive SNMP messages. The abstract service interface used for receiving messages is:

processPdu(
-- process Request/Notification PDU

IN
messageProcessingModel
-- typically, SNMP version

IN
securityModel
-- Security Model in use

IN
securityName
-- on behalf of this principal

IN
securityLevel
-- Level of Security

IN
contextEngineID
-- data from/at this SNMP entity

IN
contextName
-- data from/in this context

IN
pduVersion
-- the version of the PDU

IN
PDU
-- SNMP Protocol Data Unit

IN
maxSizeResponseScopedPDU
-- maximum size of the Response PDU

IN
stateReference
-- reference to state information


)
-- needed when sending a response

Where:

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 10]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


The procedure when a message is received is as follows:

  1. The operation type is determined from the ASN.1 tag value associated with the PDU parameter. The operation type should always be one of the types previously registered by the application.

  2. The request-id is extracted from the PDU and saved.

  3. Any PDU type specific parameters are extracted from the PDU and saved (for example, if the PDU type is an SNMPv2 GetBulk PDU, the non-repeaters and max-repetitions values are extracted).

  4. The variable-bindings are extracted from the PDU and saved.

  5. The management operation represented by the PDU type is performed with respect to the relevant MIB view within the context named by the contextName (for an SNMPv2 PDU type, the operation is performed according to the procedures set forth in [RFC1905]). The relevant MIB view is determined by the securityLevel, securityModel, contextName, securityName, and the class of the PDU type. To determine whether a particular object instance is within the relevant MIB view, the following abstract service interface is called:
statusInformation =
--
success or errorIndication

isAccessAllowed(



IN
securityModel
--
Security Model in use

IN
securityName
--
principal who wants to access

IN
securityLevel
--
Level of Security

IN
viewType
--
read, write, or notify view

IN
contextName
--
context containing variableName

IN
variableName
)
--
OID for the managed object

Where:

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 11]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Normally, the result of the management operation will be a new PDU value, and processing will continue in step (6) below. However, at any time during the processing of the management operation:

  1. The Dispatcher is called to generate a response or report message. The abstract service interface is:













Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 12]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


returnResponsePdu(


IN
messageProcessingModel
-- typically, SNMP version

IN
securityModel
-- Security Model in use

IN
securityName
-- on behalf of this principal

IN
securityLevel
-- same as on incoming request

IN
contextEngineID
-- data from/at this SNMP entity

IN
contextName
-- data from/in this context

IN
pduVersion
-- the version of the PDU

IN
PDU
-- SNMP Protocol Data Unit

IN
maxSizeResponseScopedPDU
-- maximum size of the Response PDU

IN
stateReference
-- reference to state information
-- as presented with the request

IN
statusInformation
-- success or errorIndication


)
-- error counter OID/value if error

Where:

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 13]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Note that a command responder application should always call the returnResponsePdu abstract service interface, even in the event of an error such as a resource allocation error. In the event of such an error, the PDU value passed to returnResponsePdu should contain appropriate values for errorStatus and errorIndex.

Note that the text above describes situations where the snmpUnknownContexts counter is incremented, and where the snmpUnavailableContexts counter is incremented. The difference between these is that the snmpUnknownContexts counter is incremented when a request is received for a context which is unknown to the SNMP entity. The snmpUnavailableContexts counter is incremented when a request is received for a context which is known to the SNMP entity, but is currently unavailable. Determining when a context is unavailable is implementation specific, and some implementations may never encounter this situation, and so may never increment the snmpUnavailableContexts counter.

3.3. Notification Originator Applications

A notification originator application generates SNMP messages containing Notification-Class PDUs (for example, SNMPv2-Trap PDUs or Inform PDUs). There is no requirement as to what specific types of Notification-Class PDUs a particular implementation must be capable of generating.

Notification originator applications require a mechanism for identifying the management targets to which notifications should be sent. The particular mechanism used is implementation dependent. However, if an implementation makes the configuration of management targets SNMP manageable, it MUST use the SNMP-TARGET-MIB module described in this document.

When a notification originator wishes to generate a notification, it must first determine in which context the information to be conveyed in the notification exists, i.e., it must determine the contextEngineID and contextName. It must then determine the set of management targets to which the notification should be sent. The application must also determine, for each management target, what specific PDU type the notification message should contain, and if it is to contain a Confirmed-Class PDU, the number of retries and retransmission algorithm.









Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 14]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


The mechanism by which a notification originator determines this information is implementation dependent. Once the application has determined this information, the following procedure is performed for each management target:

  1. Any appropriate filtering mechanisms are applied to determine whether the notification should be sent to the management target. If such filtering mechanisms determine that the notification should not be sent, processing continues with the next management target. Otherwise,

  2. The appropriate set of variable-bindings is retrieved from local MIB instrumentation within the relevant MIB view. The relevant MIB view is determined by the securityLevel, securityModel, contextName, and securityName of the management target. To determine whether a particular object instance is within the relevant MIB view, the isAccessAllowed abstract service interface is used, in the same manner as described in the preceding section, except that the viewType indicates a Notification-Class operation. If the statusInformation returned by isAccessAllowed does not indicate accessAllowed, the notification is not sent to the management target.

  3. The NOTIFICATION-TYPE OBJECT IDENTIFIER of the notification (this is the value of the element of the variable bindings whose name is snmpTrapOID.0, i.e., the second variable binding) is checked using the isAccessAllowed abstract service interface, using the same parameters used in the preceding step. If the statusInformation returned by isAccessAllowed does not indicate accessAllowed, the notification is not sent to the management target.

  4. A PDU is constructed using a locally unique request-id value, a PDU type as determined by the implementation, an error-status and error-index value of 0, and the variable-bindings supplied previously in step (2).

  5. If the notification contains an Unconfirmed-Class PDU, the Dispatcher is called using the following abstract service interface:









Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 15]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


statusInformation =
-- sendPduHandle if success



-- errorIndication if failure

sendPdu(


IN
transportDomain
-- transport domain to be used

IN
transportAddress
-- destination network address

IN
messageProcessingModel
-- typically, SNMP version

IN
securityModel
-- Security Model to use

IN
securityName
-- on behalf of this principal

IN
securityLevel
-- Level of Security requested

IN
contextEngineID
-- data from/at this entity

IN
contextName
-- data from/in this context

IN
pduVersion
-- the version of the PDU

IN
PDU
-- SNMP Protocol Data Unit

IN
expectResponse
)
-- TRUE or FALSE

Where:

Otherwise,







Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 16]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


  1. If the notification contains a Confirmed-Class PDU, then:

    1. The Dispatcher is called using the sendPdu abstract service interface as described in step (5) above, except that the expectResponse argument indicates that a response is expected.

    2. The application caches information about the management target.

    3. If a response is received within an appropriate time interval from the transport endpoint of the management target, the notification is considered acknowledged and the cached information is deleted. Otherwise,

    4. If a response is not received within an appropriate time period, or if a report indication is received, information about the management target is retrieved from the cache, and steps a) through d) are repeated. The number of times these steps are repeated is equal to the previously determined retry count. If this retry count is exceeded, the acknowledgement of the notification is considered to have failed, and processing of the notification for this management target is halted. Note that some report indications might be considered a failure. Such report indications should be interpreted to mean that the acknowledgement of the notification has failed, and that steps a) through d) need not be repeated.

Responses to Confirmed-Class PDU notifications will be received via the processResponsePdu abstract service interface.

To summarize, the steps that a notification originator follows when determining where to send a notification are:

3.4. Notification Receiver Applications

Notification receiver applications receive SNMP Notification messages from the Dispatcher. Before any messages can be received, the notification receiver must register with the Dispatcher using the registerContextEngineID abstract service interface. The parameters used are:





Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 17]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Once the notification receiver has registered with the Dispatcher, messages are received using the processPdu abstract service interface. Parameters are:

When an Unconfirmed-Class PDU is delivered to a notification receiver application, it first extracts the SNMP operation type, request-id, error-status, error-index, and variable-bindings from the PDU. After this, processing depends on the particular implementation.






Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 18]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


When a Confirmed-Class PDU is received, the notification receiver application follows the following procedure:

  1. The PDU type, request-id, error-status, error-index, and variable-bindings are extracted from the PDU.

  2. A Response-Class PDU is constructed using the extracted request-id and variable-bindings, and with error-status and error-index both set to 0.

  3. The Dispatcher is called to generate a response message using the returnResponsePdu abstract service interface. Parameters are:

    • The messageProcessingModel is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The securityModel is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The securityName is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The securityLevel is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The contextEngineID is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The contextName is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The pduVersion indicates the version of the PDU to be returned.

    • The PDU is the result generated in step (2) above.

    • The maxSizeResponseScopedPDU is a local value indicating the maximum size of a ScopedPDU that the application can accept.

    • The stateReference is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The statusInformation indicates that no error occurred and that a response should be generated.

  4. After this, processing depends on the particular implementation.

3.5. Proxy Forwarder Applications

A proxy forwarder application deals with forwarding SNMP messages. There are four basic types of messages which a proxy forwarder application may need to forward. These are grouped according to the class of PDU type contained in a message. The four basic types of messages are:




Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 19]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


For the first type, the proxy forwarder's role is to deliver a request for management information to an SNMP engine which is "closer" or "downstream in the path" to the SNMP engine which has access to that information, and to deliver the response containing the information back to the SNMP engine from which the request was received. The context information in a request is used to determine which SNMP engine has access to the requested information, and this is used to determine where and how to forward the request.

For the second type, the proxy forwarder's role is to determine which SNMP engines should receive notifications about management information from a particular location. The context information in a notification message determines the location to which the information contained in the notification applies. This is used to determine which SNMP engines should receive notification about this information.

For the third type, the proxy forwarder's role is to determine which previously forwarded request or notification (if any) the response matches, and to forward the response back to the initiator of the request or notification.

For the fourth type, the proxy forwarder's role is to determine which previously forwarded request or notification (if any) the Internal- Class PDU matches, and to forward the Internal-Class PDU back to the initiator of the request or notification.







Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 20]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


When forwarding messages, a proxy forwarder application must perform a translation of incoming management target information into outgoing management target information. How this translation is performed is implementation specific. In many cases, this will be driven by a preconfigured translation table. If a proxy forwarder application makes the contents of this table SNMP manageable, it MUST use the SNMP-PROXY-MIB module defined in this document.

3.5.1. Request Forwarding

There are two phases for request forwarding. First, the incoming request needs to be passed through the proxy application. Then, the resulting response needs to be passed back. These phases are described in the following two sections.

3.5.1.1. Processing an Incoming Request

A proxy forwarder application that wishes to forward request messages must first register with the Dispatcher using the registerContextEngineID abstract service interface. The proxy forwarder must register each contextEngineID for which it wishes to forward messages, as well as for each pduType. Note that as the configuration of a proxy forwarder is changed, the particular contextEngineID values for which it is forwarding may change. The proxy forwarder should call the registerContextEngineID and unregisterContextEngineID abstract service interfaces as needed to reflect its current configuration.

A proxy forwarder application should never attempt to register a value of contextEngineID which is equal to the snmpEngineID of the SNMP engine to which the proxy forwarder is associated.

Once the proxy forwarder has registered for the appropriate contextEngineID values, it can start processing messages. The following procedure is used:

  1. A message is received using the processPdu abstract service interface. The incoming management target information received from the processPdu interface is translated into outgoing management target information. Note that this translation may vary for different values of contextEngineID and/or contextName. The translation should result in a single management target.

  2. If appropriate outgoing management target information cannot be found, the proxy forwarder increments the snmpProxyDrops counter [RFC1907], and then calls the Dispatcher using the returnResponsePdu abstract service interface. Parameters are:


Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 21]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Processing of the message stops at this point. Otherwise,

  1. A new PDU is constructed. A unique value of request-id should be used in the new PDU (this value will enable a subsequent response message to be correlated with this request). The remainder of the new PDU is identical to the received PDU, unless the incoming SNMP version and the outgoing SNMP version support different PDU versions, in which case the proxy forwarder may need to perform a translation on the PDU. (A method for performing such a translation is described in [RFC2576].)

  2. The proxy forwarder calls the Dispatcher to generate the forwarded message, using the sendPdu abstract service interface. The parameters are:

    • The transportDomain is that of the outgoing management target.

    • The transportAddress is that of the outgoing management target.

    • The messageProcessingModel is that of the outgoing management target.

    • The securityModel is that of the outgoing management target.

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 22]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


  1. The proxy forwarder caches the following information in order to match an incoming response to the forwarded request:

    • The sendPduHandle returned from the call to sendPdu,

    • The request-id from the received PDU.

    • The contextEngineID,

    • The contextName,

    • The stateReference,

    • The incoming management target information,

    • The outgoing management information,

    • Any other information needed to match an incoming response to the forwarded request.

If this information cannot be cached (possibly due to a lack of resources), the proxy forwarder performs the steps described in

  1. above. Otherwise:

  1. Processing of the request stops until a response to the forwarded request is received, or until an appropriate time interval has expired. If this time interval expires before a response has been received, the cached information about this request is removed.



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 23]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


3.5.1.2. Processing an Incoming Response

A proxy forwarder follows the following procedure when an incoming response is received:

  1. The incoming response is received using the processResponsePdu interface. The proxy forwarder uses the received parameters to locate an entry in its cache of pending forwarded requests. This is done by matching the received parameters with the cached values of sendPduHandle, contextEngineID, contextName, outgoing management target information, and the request-id contained in the received PDU (the proxy forwarder must extract the request-id for this purpose). If an appropriate cache entry cannot be found, processing of the response is halted. Otherwise:

  2. The cache information is extracted, and removed from the cache.

  3. A new Response-Class PDU is constructed, using the request-id value from the original forwarded request (as extracted from the cache). All other values are identical to those in the received Response-Class PDU, unless the incoming SNMP version and the outgoing SNMP version support different PDU versions, in which case the proxy forwarder may need to perform a translation on the PDU. (A method for performing such a translation is described in [RFC2576].)

  4. The proxy forwarder calls the Dispatcher using the returnResponsePdu abstract service interface. Parameters are:

    • The messageProcessingModel indicates the Message Processing Model by which the original incoming message was processed.

    • The securityModel is that of the original incoming management target extracted from the cache.

    • The securityName is that of the original incoming management target extracted from the cache.

    • The securityLevel is that of the original incoming management target extracted from the cache.

    • The contextEngineID is the value extracted from the cache.

    • The contextName is the value extracted from the cache.

    • The pduVersion indicates the version of the PDU to be returned.

    • The PDU is the (possibly translated) Response PDU.

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 24]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


3.5.1.3. Processing an Incoming Internal-Class PDU

A proxy forwarder follows the following procedure when an incoming Internal-Class PDU is received:

  1. The incoming Internal-Class PDU is received using the processResponsePdu interface. The proxy forwarder uses the received parameters to locate an entry in its cache of pending forwarded requests. This is done by matching the received parameters with the cached values of sendPduHandle. If an appropriate cache entry cannot be found, processing of the Internal-Class PDU is halted. Otherwise:

  2. The cache information is extracted, and removed from the cache.

  3. If the original incoming management target information indicates an SNMP version which does not support Report PDUs, processing of the Internal-Class PDU is halted.

  4. The proxy forwarder calls the Dispatcher using the returnResponsePdu abstract service interface. Parameters are:

    • The messageProcessingModel indicates the Message Processing Model by which the original incoming message was processed.

    • The securityModel is that of the original incoming management target extracted from the cache.

    • The securityName is that of the original incoming management target extracted from the cache.

    • The securityLevel is that of the original incoming management target extracted from the cache.

    • The contextEngineID is the value extracted from the cache.

    • The contextName is the value extracted from the cache.

    • The pduVersion indicates the version of the PDU to be returned.


Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 25]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


3.5.2. Notification Forwarding

A proxy forwarder receives notifications in the same manner as a notification receiver application, using the processPdu abstract service interface. The following procedure is used when a notification is received:

  1. The incoming management target information received from the processPdu interface is translated into outgoing management target information. Note that this translation may vary for different values of contextEngineID and/or contextName. The translation may result in multiple management targets.

  2. If appropriate outgoing management target information cannot be found and the notification was an Unconfirmed-Class PDU, processing of the notification is halted. If appropriate outgoing management target information cannot be found and the notification was a Confirmed-Class PDU, the proxy forwarder increments the snmpProxyDrops object, and calls the Dispatcher using the returnResponsePdu abstract service interface. The parameters are:

    • The messageProcessingModel is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The securityModel is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The securityName is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The securityLevel is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The contextEngineID is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The contextName is the value from the processPdu call.


Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 26]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Processing of the message stops at this point. Otherwise,

  1. The proxy forwarder generates a notification using the procedures described in the preceding section on Notification Originators, with the following exceptions:

    • The contextEngineID and contextName values from the original received notification are used.

    • The outgoing management targets previously determined are used.

    • No filtering mechanisms are applied.

    • The variable-bindings from the original received notification are used, rather than retrieving variable-bindings from local MIB instrumentation. In particular, no access-control is applied to these variable-bindings, nor to the value of the variable-binding containing snmpTrapOID.0.

    • If the original notification contains a Confirmed-Class PDU, then any outgoing management targets for which the outgoing SNMP version does not support any PDU types that are both Notification-Class and Confirmed-Class PDUs will not be used when generating the forwarded notifications.

    • If, for any of the outgoing management targets, the incoming SNMP version and the outgoing SNMP version support different PDU versions, the proxy forwarder may need to perform a translation on the PDU. (A method for performing such a translation is described in [RFC2576].)

  2. If the original received notification contains an Unconfirmed-Class PDU, processing of the notification is now completed. Otherwise, the original received notification must contain Confirmed-Class PDU, and processing continues.


Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 27]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


  1. If the forwarded notifications included any Confirmed-Class PDUs, processing continues when the procedures described in the section for Notification Originators determine that either:

    • None of the generated notifications containing Confirmed-Class PDUs have been successfully acknowledged within the longest of the time intervals, in which case processing of the original notification is halted, or,

    • At least one of the generated notifications containing Confirmed-Class PDUs is successfully acknowledged, in which case a response to the original received notification containing an Confirmed-Class PDU is generated as described in the following steps.

  2. A Response-Class PDU is constructed, using the values of request-id and variable-bindings from the original received Notification-Class PDU, and error-status and error-index values of 0.

  3. The Dispatcher is called using the returnResponsePdu abstract service interface. Parameters are:

    • The messageProcessingModel is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The securityModel is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The securityName is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The securityLevel is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The contextEngineID is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The contextName is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The pduVersion indicates the version of the PDU constructed in step (6) above.

    • The PDU is the value constructed in step (6) above.

    • The maxSizeResponseScopedPDU is a local value indicating the maximum size of a ScopedPDU that the application can accept.

    • The stateReference is the value from the processPdu call.

    • The statusInformation indicates that no error occurred and that a Response-Class PDU message should be generated.

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 28]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


4. The Structure of the MIB Modules

There are three separate MIB modules described in this document, the management target MIB, the notification MIB, and the proxy MIB. The following sections describe the structure of these three MIB modules.

The use of these MIBs by particular types of applications is described later in this document:

4.1. The Management Target MIB Module

The SNMP-TARGET-MIB module contains objects for defining management targets. It consists of two tables and conformance/compliance statements.

The first table, the snmpTargetAddrTable, contains information about transport domains and addresses. It also contains an object, snmpTargetAddrTagList, which provides a mechanism for grouping entries.

The second table, the snmpTargetParamsTable, contains information about SNMP version and security information to be used when sending messages to particular transport domains and addresses.

The Management Target MIB is intended to provide a general-purpose mechanism for specifying transport address, and for specifying parameters of SNMP messages generated by an SNMP entity. It is used within this document for generation of notifications and for proxy forwarding. However, it may be used for other purposes. If another document makes use of this MIB, that document is responsible for specifying how it is used. For example, [RFC2576] uses this MIB for source address validation of SNMPv1 messages.

4.1.1. Tag Lists

The snmpTargetAddrTagList object is used for grouping entries in the snmpTargetAddrTable. The value of this object contains a list of tag values which are used to select target addresses to be used for a particular operation.



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 29]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


A tag value, which may also be used in MIB objects other than snmpTargetAddrTagList, is an arbitrary string of octets, but may not contain a delimiter character. Delimiter characters are defined to be one of the following characters:

In addition, a tag value within a tag list may not have a zero length. Generally, a particular MIB object may contain either

For a list of tag values, these constraints imply certain restrictions on the value of a MIB object:

4.1.2. Definitions

SNMP-TARGET-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS

MODULE-IDENTITY,
OBJECT-TYPE,
snmpModules,
Counter32,
Integer32
FROM SNMPv2-SMI

TEXTUAL-CONVENTION,
TDomain,
TAddress,
TimeInterval,
RowStatus,
StorageType,



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 30]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


TestAndIncr
FROM SNMPv2-TC

SnmpSecurityModel,
SnmpMessageProcessingModel,
SnmpSecurityLevel,
SnmpAdminString
FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB

MODULE-COMPLIANCE,
OBJECT-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF;

snmpTargetMIB MODULE-IDENTITY

LAST-UPDATED "200210140000Z"
ORGANIZATION "IETF SNMPv3 Working Group" CONTACT-INFO
"WG-email: snmpv3@lists.tislabs.com

Subscribe:
majordomo@lists.tislabs.com In message body: subscribe snmpv3
Co-Chair:
Russ Mundy
Network Associates Laboratories
Postal:
15204 Omega Drive, Suite 300 Rockville, MD 20850-4601 USA
EMail:
mundy@tislabs.com
Phone:
+1 301-947-7107


Co-Chair:
David Harrington Enterasys Networks
Postal:
35 Industrial Way P. O. Box 5004 Rochester, New Hampshire 03866-5005 USA
EMail:
dbh@enterasys.com
Phone:
+1 603-337-2614


Co-editor:
David B. Levi Nortel Networks
Postal:
3505 Kesterwood Drive Knoxville, Tennessee 37918
EMail:
dlevi@nortelnetworks.com
Phone:
+1 865 686 0432


Co-editor:
Paul Meyer
Secure Computing Corporation

Postal: 2675 Long Lake Road



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 31]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002



Roseville, Minnesota 55113
EMail:
paul_meyer@securecomputing.com
Phone:
+1 651 628 1592


Co-editor:
Bob Stewart
Retired"

DESCRIPTION
"This MIB module defines MIB objects which provide

mechanisms to remotely configure the parameters used by an SNMP entity for the generation of SNMP messages.

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). This version of this MIB module is part of RFC 3413; see the RFC itself for full legal notices.


"


REVISION
"200210140000Z" -- 14 October 2002

DESCRIPTION
"Fixed DISPLAY-HINTS for UTF-8 strings, fixed hex
value of LF characters, clarified meaning of zero
length tag values, improved tag list examples.
Published as RFC 3413."

REVISION
"199808040000Z" -- 4 August 1998

DESCRIPTION
"Clarifications, published as
RFC 2573."

REVISION
"199707140000Z" -- 14 July 1997

DESCRIPTION
"The initial revision, published as RFC2273."

::= { snmpModules 12 }
snmpTargetObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTargetMIB 1 }
snmpTargetConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTargetMIB 3 }


SnmpTagValue
:= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION DISPLAY-HINT "255t"

STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An octet string containing a tag value.
Tag values are preferably in human-readable form.



To facilitate internationalization, this information is represented using the ISO/IEC IS 10646-1 character set, encoded as an octet string using the UTF-8 character encoding scheme described in RFC 2279.

Since additional code points are added by amendments to the 10646 standard from time to time, implementations must be prepared to encounter any code point from 0x00000000 to 0x7fffffff.

The use of control codes should be avoided, and certain



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 32]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


control codes are not allowed as described below.

For code points not directly supported by user interface hardware or software, an alternative means of entry and display, such as hexadecimal, may be provided.

For information encoded in 7-bit US-ASCII, the UTF-8 representation is identical to the US-ASCII encoding.

Note that when this TC is used for an object that is used or envisioned to be used as an index, then a SIZE restriction must be specified so that the number of sub-identifiers for any object instance does not exceed the limit of 128, as defined by [RFC1905].

An object of this type contains a single tag value which is used to select a set of entries in a table.

A tag value is an arbitrary string of octets, but may not contain a delimiter character. Delimiter characters are defined to be one of the following:

  • An ASCII space character (0x20).

  • An ASCII TAB character (0x09).

  • An ASCII carriage return (CR) character (0x0D).

  • An ASCII line feed (LF) character (0x0A).

Delimiter characters are used to separate tag values in a tag list. An object of this type may only contain a single tag value, and so delimiter characters are not allowed in a value of this type.

Note that a tag value of 0 length means that no tag is defined. In other words, a tag value of 0 length would never match anything in a tag list, and would never select any table entries.

Some examples of valid tag values are:

  • 'acme'

  • 'router'

  • 'host'

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 33]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


The use of a tag value to select table entries is

application and MIB specific."
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255))


SnmpTagList
:= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION DISPLAY-HINT "255t"

STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An octet string containing a list of tag values.
Tag values are preferably in human-readable form.



To facilitate internationalization, this information is represented using the ISO/IEC IS 10646-1 character set, encoded as an octet string using the UTF-8 character encoding scheme described in RFC 2279.

Since additional code points are added by amendments to the 10646 standard from time to time, implementations must be prepared to encounter any code point from 0x00000000 to 0x7fffffff.

The use of control codes should be avoided, except as described below.

For code points not directly supported by user interface hardware or software, an alternative means of entry and display, such as hexadecimal, may be provided.

For information encoded in 7-bit US-ASCII, the UTF-8 representation is identical to the US-ASCII encoding.

An object of this type contains a list of tag values which are used to select a set of entries in a table.

A tag value is an arbitrary string of octets, but may not contain a delimiter character. Delimiter characters are defined to be one of the following:

  • An ASCII space character (0x20).

  • An ASCII TAB character (0x09).

  • An ASCII carriage return (CR) character (0x0D).

  • An ASCII line feed (LF) character (0x0A).

Delimiter characters are used to separate tag values



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 34]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


in a tag list. Only a single delimiter character may occur between two tag values. A tag value may not have a zero length. These constraints imply certain restrictions on the contents of this object:

  • There cannot be a leading or trailing delimiter character.

  • There cannot be multiple adjacent delimiter characters.

Some examples of valid tag lists are:

  • '' -- an empty list

  • 'acme' -- list of one tag

  • 'host router bridge' -- list of several tags

Note that although a tag value may not have a length of zero, an empty string is still valid. This indicates an empty list (i.e. there are no tag values in the list).

The use of the tag list to select table entries is application and MIB specific. Typically, an application will provide one or more tag values, and any entry which contains some combination of these tag values


will be selected."
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255))


--
The snmpTargetObjects group


snmpTargetSpinLock OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX TestAndIncr
MAX-ACCESS read-write
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object is used to facilitate modification of table
entries in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB module by multiple
managers. In particular, it is useful when modifying

the value of the snmpTargetAddrTagList object.

The procedure for modifying the snmpTargetAddrTagList object is as follows:



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 35]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


  1. Retrieve the value of snmpTargetSpinLock and of snmpTargetAddrTagList.

  2. Generate a new value for snmpTargetAddrTagList.

  3. Set the value of snmpTargetSpinLock to the retrieved value, and the value of snmpTargetAddrTagList to the new value. If the set fails for the snmpTargetSpinLock object, go back to step 1."

::= { snmpTargetObjects 1 }

snmpTargetAddrTable OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpTargetAddrEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A table of transport addresses to be used in the generation
of SNMP messages."
::= { snmpTargetObjects 2 }
snmpTargetAddrEntry OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpTargetAddrEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A transport address to be used in the generation
of SNMP operations.


Entries in the snmpTargetAddrTable are created and deleted using the snmpTargetAddrRowStatus object."

INDEX { IMPLIED snmpTargetAddrName } ::= { snmpTargetAddrTable 1 }

SnmpTargetAddrEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

snmpTargetAddrName
SnmpAdminString,

snmpTargetAddrTDomain
TDomain,

snmpTargetAddrTAddress
TAddress,

snmpTargetAddrTimeout
TimeInterval,

snmpTargetAddrRetryCount
Integer32,

snmpTargetAddrTagList
SnmpTagList,

snmpTargetAddrParams
SnmpAdminString,

snmpTargetAddrStorageType
StorageType,

}

snmpTargetAddrRowStatus

RowStatus

snmpTargetAddrName OBJECT-TYPE


SYNTAX SnmpAdminString (SIZE(1..32))



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 36]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002



MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The locally arbitrary, but unique identifier associated
with this snmpTargetAddrEntry."
::= { snmpTargetAddrEntry 1 }
snmpTargetAddrTDomain OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX TDomain
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object indicates the transport type of the address
contained in the snmpTargetAddrTAddress object."
::= { snmpTargetAddrEntry 2 }
snmpTargetAddrTAddress OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX TAddress
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object contains a transport address. The format of
this address depends on the value of the
snmpTargetAddrTDomain object."

::= { snmpTargetAddrEntry 3 }

snmpTargetAddrTimeout OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX TimeInterval
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object should reflect the expected maximum round
trip time for communicating with the transport address
defined by this row. When a message is sent to this

address, and a response (if one is expected) is not received within this time period, an implementation may assume that the response will not be delivered.

Note that the time interval that an application waits for a response may actually be derived from the value of this object. The method for deriving the actual time interval is implementation dependent. One such method is to derive the expected round trip time based on a particular retransmission algorithm and on the number of timeouts which have occurred. The type of message may also be considered when deriving expected round trip times for retransmissions. For example, if a message is being sent with a securityLevel that indicates both



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 37]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


authentication and privacy, the derived value may be increased to compensate for extra processing time spent during authentication and encryption processing."

DEFVAL { 1500 }
::= { snmpTargetAddrEntry 4 }

snmpTargetAddrRetryCount OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Integer32 (0..255)
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object specifies a default number of retries to be
attempted when a response is not received for a generated
message. An application may provide its own retry count,

in which case the value of this object is ignored."

DEFVAL { 3 }
::= { snmpTargetAddrEntry 5 }

snmpTargetAddrTagList OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpTagList
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object contains a list of tag values which are
used to select target addresses for a particular
operation."

DEFVAL { "" }
::= { snmpTargetAddrEntry 6 }

snmpTargetAddrParams OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpAdminString (SIZE(1..32))
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The value of this object identifies an entry in the
snmpTargetParamsTable. The identified entry
contains SNMP parameters to be used when generating

messages to be sent to this transport address."

::= { snmpTargetAddrEntry 7 }

snmpTargetAddrStorageType OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION


"The storage type for this
conceptual row.

Conceptual rows having the value 'permanent' need not

allow write-access to any
columnar objects in the row."



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 38]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { snmpTargetAddrEntry 8 }

snmpTargetAddrRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The status of this conceptual row.

To create a row in this table, a manager must set this object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).

Until instances of all corresponding columns are appropriately configured, the value of the corresponding instance of the snmpTargetAddrRowStatus column is 'notReady'.

In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active until the corresponding instances of snmpTargetAddrTDomain, snmpTargetAddrTAddress, and snmpTargetAddrParams have all been set.

The following objects may not be modified while the value of this object is active(1):

  • snmpTargetAddrTDomain
  • snmpTargetAddrTAddress

An attempt to set these objects while the value of snmpTargetAddrRowStatus is active(1) will result in an inconsistentValue error."

::= { snmpTargetAddrEntry 9 }

snmpTargetParamsTable OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpTargetParamsEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A table of SNMP target information to be used
in the generation of SNMP messages."
::= { snmpTargetObjects 3 }
snmpTargetParamsEntry OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpTargetParamsEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A set of SNMP target information.



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 39]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Entries in the snmpTargetParamsTable are created and deleted using the snmpTargetParamsRowStatus object."

INDEX { IMPLIED snmpTargetParamsName } ::= { snmpTargetParamsTable 1 }

SnmpTargetParamsEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
}
snmpTargetParamsName SnmpAdminString,
snmpTargetParamsMPModel SnmpMessageProcessingModel,
snmpTargetParamsSecurityModel SnmpSecurityModel,
snmpTargetParamsSecurityName SnmpAdminString,
snmpTargetParamsSecurityLevel SnmpSecurityLevel,
snmpTargetParamsStorageType StorageType,
snmpTargetParamsRowStatus RowStatus
snmpTargetParamsName OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpAdminString (SIZE(1..32))
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The locally arbitrary, but unique identifier associated
with this snmpTargetParamsEntry."
::= { snmpTargetParamsEntry 1 }
snmpTargetParamsMPModel OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpMessageProcessingModel
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The Message Processing Model to be used when generating
SNMP messages using this entry."
::= { snmpTargetParamsEntry 2 }
snmpTargetParamsSecurityModel OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpSecurityModel (1..2147483647)
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The Security Model to be used when generating SNMP
messages using this entry. An implementation may
choose to return an inconsistentValue error if an

attempt is made to set this variable to a value for a security model which the implementation does not support."

::= { snmpTargetParamsEntry 3 }

snmpTargetParamsSecurityName OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpAdminString




Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 40]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The securityName which identifies the Principal on
whose behalf SNMP messages will be generated using
this entry."

::= { snmpTargetParamsEntry 4 }

snmpTargetParamsSecurityLevel OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpSecurityLevel
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The Level of Security to be used when generating
SNMP messages using this entry."
::= { snmpTargetParamsEntry 5 }
snmpTargetParamsStorageType OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The storage type for this conceptual row.
Conceptual rows having the value 'permanent' need not
allow write-access to any columnar objects in the row."

DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { snmpTargetParamsEntry 6 }

snmpTargetParamsRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX
RowStatus

MAX-ACCESS
read-create

STATUS
DESCRIPTION
current

"The status of this conceptual row.

To create a row in this table, a manager must set this object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).

Until instances of all corresponding columns are appropriately configured, the value of the corresponding instance of the snmpTargetParamsRowStatus column is 'notReady'.

In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active until the corresponding snmpTargetParamsMPModel, snmpTargetParamsSecurityModel,



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 41]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


snmpTargetParamsSecurityName, and snmpTargetParamsSecurityLevel have all been set.

The following objects may not be modified while the value of this object is active(1):

  • snmpTargetParamsMPModel
  • snmpTargetParamsSecurityModel
  • snmpTargetParamsSecurityName
  • snmpTargetParamsSecurityLevel

An attempt to set these objects while the value of snmpTargetParamsRowStatus is active(1) will result in an inconsistentValue error."

::= { snmpTargetParamsEntry 7 }

snmpUnavailableContexts OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The total number of packets received by the SNMP
engine which were dropped because the context
contained in the message was unavailable."

::= { snmpTargetObjects 4 }

snmpUnknownContexts OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The total number of packets received by the SNMP
engine which were dropped because the context
contained in the message was unknown."

::= { snmpTargetObjects 5 }

--
--
-- Conformance information
--
--



snmpTargetCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=


{ snmpTargetConformance 1 }
snmpTargetGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::=
{ snmpTargetConformance 2 }


-- Compliance statements




Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 42]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002




snmpTargetCommandResponderCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE

STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for SNMP entities which include
a command responder application."
MODULE -- This Module

MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpTargetCommandResponderGroup } ::= { snmpTargetCompliances 1 }

snmpTargetBasicGroup OBJECT-GROUP

OBJECTS {
snmpTargetSpinLock,
snmpTargetAddrTDomain,
snmpTargetAddrTAddress,
snmpTargetAddrTagList,
snmpTargetAddrParams,
snmpTargetAddrStorageType, snmpTargetAddrRowStatus,
snmpTargetParamsMPModel,
snmpTargetParamsSecurityModel, snmpTargetParamsSecurityName, snmpTargetParamsSecurityLevel, snmpTargetParamsStorageType, snmpTargetParamsRowStatus

       }
       STATUS      current
       DESCRIPTION
           "A collection of objects providing basic remote
            configuration of management targets."
       ::= { snmpTargetGroups 1 }

snmpTargetResponseGroup OBJECT-GROUP

OBJECTS {
snmpTargetAddrTimeout,
snmpTargetAddrRetryCount

}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION


"A collection of objects
providing remote configuration
of management targets for
applications which generate
SNMP messages for which
a
response message would be

expected."

::= { snmpTargetGroups 2 }

snmpTargetCommandResponderGroup OBJECT-GROUP



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 43]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


OBJECTS {
snmpUnavailableContexts,
snmpUnknownContexts

       }
       STATUS      current
       DESCRIPTION
           "A collection of objects required for command responder
            applications, used for counting error conditions."
       ::= { snmpTargetGroups 3 }

END

4.2. The Notification MIB Module

The SNMP-NOTIFICATION-MIB module contains objects for the remote configuration of the parameters used by an SNMP entity for the generation of notifications. It consists of three tables and conformance/compliance statements. The first table, the snmpNotifyTable, contains entries which select which entries in the snmpTargetAddrTable should be used for generating notifications, and the type of notifications to be generated.

The second table, the snmpNotifyFilterProfileTable, sparsely augments the snmpTargetParamsTable with an object which is used to associate a set of filters with a particular management target.

The third table, the snmpNotifyFilterTable, defines filters which are used to limit the number of notifications which are generated using particular management targets.

4.2.1. Definitions

SNMP-NOTIFICATION-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS

MODULE-IDENTITY,
OBJECT-TYPE,
snmpModules
FROM SNMPv2-SMI

RowStatus,
StorageType
FROM SNMPv2-TC

SnmpAdminString
FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB

SnmpTagValue,



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 44]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


snmpTargetParamsName
FROM SNMP-TARGET-MIB

MODULE-COMPLIANCE,
OBJECT-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF;

snmpNotificationMIB MODULE-IDENTITY

LAST-UPDATED "200210140000Z"
ORGANIZATION "IETF SNMPv3 Working Group" CONTACT-INFO
"WG-email: snmpv3@lists.tislabs.com

Subscribe:
majordomo@lists.tislabs.com In message body: subscribe snmpv3
Co-Chair:
Russ Mundy
Network Associates Laboratories
Postal:
15204 Omega Drive, Suite 300 Rockville, MD 20850-4601 USA
EMail:
mundy@tislabs.com
Phone:
+1 301-947-7107


Co-Chair:
David Harrington Enterasys Networks
Postal:
35 Industrial Way P. O. Box 5004 Rochester, New Hampshire 03866-5005 USA
EMail:
dbh@enterasys.com
Phone:
+1 603-337-2614


Co-editor:
David B. Levi Nortel Networks
Postal:
3505 Kesterwood Drive Knoxville, Tennessee 37918
EMail:
dlevi@nortelnetworks.com
Phone:
+1 865 686 0432


Co-editor:
Paul Meyer
Secure Computing Corporation
Postal:
2675 Long Lake Road Roseville, Minnesota 55113
EMail:
paul_meyer@securecomputing.com
Phone:
+1 651 628 1592


Co-editor:
Bob Stewart
Retired"

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 45]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


DESCRIPTION
"This MIB module defines MIB objects which provide

mechanisms to remotely configure the parameters used by an SNMP entity for the generation of notifications.

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). This version of this MIB module is part of RFC 3413; see the RFC itself for full legal notices.


"
REVISION "200210140000Z" -- 14 October 2002
DESCRIPTION "Clarifications, published as
RFC 3413."
REVISION "199808040000Z" -- 4 August 1998
DESCRIPTION "Clarifications, published as
RFC 2573."
REVISION "199707140000Z" -- 14 July 1997
DESCRIPTION "The initial revision, published as RFC2273."
::= { snmpModules 13 }
snmpNotifyObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=

{ snmpNotificationMIB 1 }
snmpNotifyConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=

{ snmpNotificationMIB 3 }


--
The snmpNotifyObjects group


snmpNotifyTable OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpNotifyEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This table is used to select management targets which should
receive notifications, as well as the type of notification
which should be sent to each selected management target."

::= { snmpNotifyObjects 1 }

snmpNotifyEntry OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpNotifyEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table selects a set of management targets
which should receive notifications, as well as the type of



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 46]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


notification which should be sent to each selected management target.

Entries in the snmpNotifyTable are created and deleted using the snmpNotifyRowStatus object."

INDEX { IMPLIED snmpNotifyName } ::= { snmpNotifyTable 1 }

SnmpNotifyEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
}
snmpNotifyName SnmpAdminString,
snmpNotifyTag SnmpTagValue,
snmpNotifyType INTEGER,
snmpNotifyStorageType StorageType,
snmpNotifyRowStatus RowStatus
snmpNotifyName OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpAdminString (SIZE(1..32))
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The locally arbitrary, but unique identifier associated
with this snmpNotifyEntry."
::= { snmpNotifyEntry 1 }
snmpNotifyTag OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpTagValue
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object contains a single tag value which is used
to select entries in the snmpTargetAddrTable. Any entry
in the snmpTargetAddrTable which contains a tag value

which is equal to the value of an instance of this object is selected. If this object contains a value of zero length, no entries are selected."

DEFVAL { "" }
::= { snmpNotifyEntry 2 }

snmpNotifyType OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX
INTEGER {
trap(1),
inform(2)
}

MAX-ACCESS
read-create

STATUS
DESCRIPTION
current

"This object determines the type of notification to



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 47]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


be generated for entries in the snmpTargetAddrTable selected by the corresponding instance of snmpNotifyTag. This value is only used when generating notifications, and is ignored when using the snmpTargetAddrTable for other purposes.

If the value of this object is trap(1), then any messages generated for selected rows will contain Unconfirmed-Class PDUs.

If the value of this object is inform(2), then any messages generated for selected rows will contain Confirmed-Class PDUs.

Note that if an SNMP entity only supports generation of Unconfirmed-Class PDUs (and not Confirmed-Class PDUs), then this object may be read-only."

DEFVAL { trap }
::= { snmpNotifyEntry 3 }

snmpNotifyStorageType OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The storage type for this conceptual row.
Conceptual rows having the value 'permanent' need not
allow write-access to any columnar objects in the row."

DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { snmpNotifyEntry 4 }

snmpNotifyRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The status of this conceptual row.

To create a row in this table, a manager must set this object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5)."

::= { snmpNotifyEntry 5 }

snmpNotifyFilterProfileTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpNotifyFilterProfileEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current




Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 48]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


DESCRIPTION
"This table is used to associate a notification filter

profile with a particular set of target parameters."

::= { snmpNotifyObjects 2 }

snmpNotifyFilterProfileEntry OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpNotifyFilterProfileEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"An entry in this table indicates the name of the filter
profile to be used when generating notifications using
the corresponding entry in the snmpTargetParamsTable.


Entries in the snmpNotifyFilterProfileTable are created and deleted using the snmpNotifyFilterProfileRowStatus object."

INDEX { IMPLIED snmpTargetParamsName } ::= { snmpNotifyFilterProfileTable 1 }

SnmpNotifyFilterProfileEntry ::= SEQUENCE {

snmpNotifyFilterProfileName
SnmpAdminString,

snmpNotifyFilterProfileStorType
StorageType,

}

snmpNotifyFilterProfileRowStatus

RowStatus

snmpNotifyFilterProfileName OBJECT-TYPE


SYNTAX SnmpAdminString (SIZE(1..32))

MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION


"The name of the filter profile
to be used when generating

notifications using the corresponding entry in the

snmpTargetAddrTable."

::= { snmpNotifyFilterProfileEntry 1 }

snmpNotifyFilterProfileStorType OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The storage type for this conceptual row.
Conceptual rows having the value 'permanent' need not
allow write-access to any columnar objects in the row."

DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { snmpNotifyFilterProfileEntry 2 }

snmpNotifyFilterProfileRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 49]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


SYNTAX
RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS
read-create
STATUS
DESCRIPTION
current
"The status of this conceptual row.

To create a row in this table, a manager must set this object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).

Until instances of all corresponding columns are appropriately configured, the value of the corresponding instance of the snmpNotifyFilterProfileRowStatus column is 'notReady'.

In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active until the corresponding instance of snmpNotifyFilterProfileName has been set."

::= { snmpNotifyFilterProfileEntry 3 }

snmpNotifyFilterTable OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpNotifyFilterEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The table of filter profiles. Filter profiles are used
to determine whether particular management targets should
receive particular notifications.


When a notification is generated, it must be compared with the filters associated with each management target which is configured to receive notifications, in order to determine whether it may be sent to each such management target.

A more complete discussion of notification filtering can be found in section 6. of [SNMP-APPL]."

::= { snmpNotifyObjects 3 }

snmpNotifyFilterEntry OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX
SnmpNotifyFilterEntry

MAX-ACCESS
not-accessible

STATUS
DESCRIPTION
current

"An element of a filter profile.

Entries in the snmpNotifyFilterTable are created and deleted using the snmpNotifyFilterRowStatus object."



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 50]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002



INDEX { snmpNotifyFilterProfileName,

IMPLIED snmpNotifyFilterSubtree }

::= { snmpNotifyFilterTable 1 }


SnmpNotifyFilterEntry ::= SEQUENCE {


snmpNotifyFilterSubtree
OBJECT IDENTIFIER,

snmpNotifyFilterMask
OCTET STRING,

snmpNotifyFilterType
INTEGER,

snmpNotifyFilterStorageType
StorageType,

}

snmpNotifyFilterRowStatus

RowStatus

snmpNotifyFilterSubtree OBJECT-TYPE


SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION


"The MIB subtree which, when
combined with the corresponding

instance of snmpNotifyFilterMask, defines a family of

subtrees which are included
in or excluded from the

filter profile."

::= { snmpNotifyFilterEntry 1 }

snmpNotifyFilterMask OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..16))
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The bit mask which, in combination with the corresponding
instance of snmpNotifyFilterSubtree, defines a family of
subtrees which are included in or excluded from the

filter profile.

Each bit of this bit mask corresponds to a sub-identifier of snmpNotifyFilterSubtree, with the most significant bit of the i-th octet of this octet string value (extended if necessary, see below) corresponding to the (8*i - 7)-th sub-identifier, and the least significant bit of the i-th octet of this octet string corresponding to the (8*i)-th sub-identifier, where i is in the range 1 through 16.

Each bit of this bit mask specifies whether or not the corresponding sub-identifiers must match when determining if an OBJECT IDENTIFIER matches this family of filter subtrees; a '1' indicates that an exact match must occur; a '0' indicates 'wild card', i.e., any sub-identifier value matches.



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 51]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Thus, the OBJECT IDENTIFIER X of an object instance is contained in a family of filter subtrees if, for each sub-identifier of the value of snmpNotifyFilterSubtree, either:

the i-th bit of snmpNotifyFilterMask is 0, or

the i-th sub-identifier of X is equal to the i-th sub-identifier of the value of snmpNotifyFilterSubtree.

If the value of this bit mask is M bits long and there are more than M sub-identifiers in the corresponding instance of snmpNotifyFilterSubtree, then the bit mask is extended with 1's to be the required length.

Note that when the value of this object is the zero-length string, this extension rule results in a mask of all-1's being used (i.e., no 'wild card'), and the family of filter subtrees is the one subtree uniquely identified by the corresponding instance of snmpNotifyFilterSubtree."

DEFVAL { ''H }
::= { snmpNotifyFilterEntry 2 }

snmpNotifyFilterType OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER {
included(1),
excluded(2)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object indicates whether the family of filter subtrees
defined by this entry are included in or excluded from a
filter. A more detailed discussion of the use of this

object can be found in section 6. of [SNMP-APPL]."

DEFVAL { included }
::= { snmpNotifyFilterEntry 3 }

snmpNotifyFilterStorageType OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The storage type for this conceptual row.
Conceptual rows having the value 'permanent' need not



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 52]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


allow write-access to any columnar objects in the row."

DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { snmpNotifyFilterEntry 4 }

snmpNotifyFilterRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX
RowStatus

MAX-ACCESS
read-create

STATUS
DESCRIPTION
current

"The status of this conceptual row.

To create a row in this table, a manager must set this object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5)."

::= { snmpNotifyFilterEntry 5 }

--
--
-- Conformance information
--
--



snmpNotifyCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=



{ snmpNotifyConformance 1 }
snmpNotifyGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER
::=


{ snmpNotifyConformance 2 }



--
Compliance statements




snmpNotifyBasicCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE

STATUS current
DESCRIPTION


"The compliance statement for minimal SNMP entities which

implement only SNMP Unconfirmed-Class notifications and

read-create operations on only
the snmpTargetAddrTable."

MODULE SNMP-TARGET-MIB
MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpTargetBasicGroup }

OBJECT snmpTargetParamsMPModel MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION

"Create/delete/modify access is not required."

OBJECT snmpTargetParamsSecurityModel



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 53]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION

"Create/delete/modify access is not required."

OBJECT snmpTargetParamsSecurityName MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION

"Create/delete/modify access is not required."

OBJECT snmpTargetParamsSecurityLevel MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION

"Create/delete/modify access is not required."

OBJECT snmpTargetParamsStorageType SYNTAX INTEGER {

readOnly(5)

}
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION

"Create/delete/modify access is not required. Support of the values other(1), volatile(2), nonVolatile(3), and permanent(4) is not required."

OBJECT snmpTargetParamsRowStatus SYNTAX INTEGER {

active(1)

}
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION

"Create/delete/modify access to the snmpTargetParamsTable is not required. Support of the values notInService(2), notReady(3), createAndGo(4), createAndWait(5), and destroy(6) is not required."

MODULE -- This Module
MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpNotifyGroup }

OBJECT snmpNotifyTag
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION

"Create/delete/modify access is not required."

OBJECT snmpNotifyType
SYNTAX INTEGER {

trap(1)

}



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 54]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION

"Create/delete/modify access is not required. Support of the value notify(2) is not required."

OBJECT snmpNotifyStorageType SYNTAX INTEGER {

readOnly(5)

}
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION

"Create/delete/modify access is not required. Support of the values other(1), volatile(2), nonVolatile(3), and permanent(4) is not required."

OBJECT snmpNotifyRowStatus SYNTAX INTEGER {

active(1)

}
MIN-ACCESS read-only
DESCRIPTION

"Create/delete/modify access to the snmpNotifyTable is not required. Support of the values notInService(2), notReady(3), createAndGo(4), createAndWait(5), and destroy(6) is not required."

::= { snmpNotifyCompliances 1 }

snmpNotifyBasicFiltersCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE

STATUS current
DESCRIPTION


"The compliance statement for SNMP entities which implement

SNMP Unconfirmed-Class
notifications with filtering, and

read-create operations
on all related tables."

MODULE SNMP-TARGET-MIB
MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpTargetBasicGroup } MODULE -- This Module
MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpNotifyGroup,


snmpNotifyFilterGroup }
::= { snmpNotifyCompliances 2 }
snmpNotifyFullCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE

STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for SNMP entities which either
implement only SNMP Confirmed-Class notifications, or both
SNMP Unconfirmed-Class and Confirmed-Class notifications,



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 55]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


plus filtering and read-create operations on all related tables."

MODULE SNMP-TARGET-MIB
MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpTargetBasicGroup,

MODULE -- This Module
snmpTargetResponseGroup }
MANDATORY-GROUPS {
snmpNotifyGroup,
snmpNotifyFilterGroup }

::= { snmpNotifyCompliances 3 }

snmpNotifyGroup OBJECT-GROUP

OBJECTS {
snmpNotifyTag,
snmpNotifyType,
snmpNotifyStorageType,
snmpNotifyRowStatus

}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION


"A collection of objects
for selecting which management
targets are used for
generating notifications, and the
type of notification
to
be generated for each selected

management target."

::= { snmpNotifyGroups 1 }

snmpNotifyFilterGroup OBJECT-GROUP

OBJECTS {
snmpNotifyFilterProfileName, snmpNotifyFilterProfileStorType, snmpNotifyFilterProfileRowStatus, snmpNotifyFilterMask,
snmpNotifyFilterType,
snmpNotifyFilterStorageType, snmpNotifyFilterRowStatus

}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION

"A collection of
objects providing remote configuration
of notification
filters."
::= { snmpNotifyGroups 2 }

END









Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 56]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


4.3. The Proxy MIB Module

The SNMP-PROXY-MIB module, which defines MIB objects that provide mechanisms to remotely configure the parameters used by an SNMP entity for proxy forwarding operations, contains a single table. This table, snmpProxyTable, is used to define translations between management targets for use when forwarding messages.

4.3.1. Definitions

SNMP-PROXY-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

IMPORTS

MODULE-IDENTITY,
OBJECT-TYPE,
snmpModules
FROM SNMPv2-SMI

RowStatus,
StorageType
FROM SNMPv2-TC

SnmpEngineID,
SnmpAdminString
FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB

SnmpTagValue
FROM SNMP-TARGET-MIB

MODULE-COMPLIANCE,
OBJECT-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF;

snmpProxyMIB MODULE-IDENTITY

LAST-UPDATED "200210140000Z"
ORGANIZATION "IETF SNMPv3 Working Group" CONTACT-INFO
"WG-email: snmpv3@lists.tislabs.com

Subscribe:
majordomo@lists.tislabs.com In message body: subscribe snmpv3
Co-Chair:
Russ Mundy
Network Associates Laboratories
Postal:
15204 Omega Drive, Suite 300 Rockville, MD 20850-4601 USA
EMail:
mundy@tislabs.com
Phone:
+1 301-947-7107



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 57]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Co-Chair:
David Harrington Enterasys Networks
Postal:
35 Industrial Way P. O. Box 5004 Rochester, New Hampshire 03866-5005 USA
EMail:
dbh@enterasys.com
Phone:
+1 603-337-2614


Co-editor:
David B. Levi Nortel Networks
Postal:
3505 Kesterwood Drive Knoxville, Tennessee 37918
EMail:
dlevi@nortelnetworks.com
Phone:
+1 865 686 0432


Co-editor:
Paul Meyer
Secure Computing Corporation
Postal:
2675 Long Lake Road Roseville, Minnesota 55113
EMail:
paul_meyer@securecomputing.com
Phone:
+1 651 628 1592


Co-editor:
Bob Stewart
Retired"

DESCRIPTION
"This MIB module defines MIB objects which provide

mechanisms to remotely configure the parameters used by a proxy forwarding application.

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). This version of this MIB module is part of RFC 3413; see the RFC itself for full legal notices.

           "
       REVISION    "200210140000Z"             -- 14 October 2002
       DESCRIPTION "Clarifications, published as
                    RFC 3413."
       REVISION    "199808040000Z"             -- 4 August 1998
       DESCRIPTION "Clarifications, published as
                    RFC 2573."
       REVISION    "199707140000Z"             -- 14 July 1997
       DESCRIPTION "The initial revision, published as RFC2273."
       ::= { snmpModules 14 }

   snmpProxyObjects        OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpProxyMIB 1 }
   snmpProxyConformance    OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpProxyMIB 3 }


--



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 58]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


--
-- The snmpProxyObjects group



snmpProxyTable OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpProxyEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The table of translation parameters used by proxy forwarder
applications for forwarding SNMP messages."
::= { snmpProxyObjects 2 }
snmpProxyEntry OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpProxyEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A set of translation parameters used by a proxy forwarder
application for forwarding SNMP messages.


Entries in the snmpProxyTable are created and deleted using the snmpProxyRowStatus object."

INDEX { IMPLIED snmpProxyName } ::= { snmpProxyTable 1 }

SnmpProxyEntry ::= SEQUENCE {


snmpProxyName
SnmpAdminString,

snmpProxyType
INTEGER,

snmpProxyContextEngineID
SnmpEngineID,

snmpProxyContextName
SnmpAdminString,

snmpProxyTargetParamsIn
SnmpAdminString,

snmpProxySingleTargetOut
SnmpAdminString,

snmpProxyMultipleTargetOut
SnmpTagValue,

snmpProxyStorageType
StorageType,

}

snmpProxyRowStatus

RowStatus

snmpProxyName OBJECT-TYPE


SYNTAX SnmpAdminString
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
(SIZE(1..32))

"The locally arbitrary,
but unique identifier associated

with this snmpProxyEntry."

::= { snmpProxyEntry 1 }





Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 59]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


snmpProxyType OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX INTEGER {
read(1),
write(2),
trap(3),
inform(4)
}
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The type of message that may be forwarded using
the translation parameters defined by this entry."
::= { snmpProxyEntry 2 }
snmpProxyContextEngineID OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpEngineID
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The contextEngineID contained in messages that
may be forwarded using the translation parameters
defined by this entry."

::= { snmpProxyEntry 3 }

snmpProxyContextName OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpAdminString
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The contextName contained in messages that may be
forwarded using the translation parameters defined
by this entry.


This object is optional, and if not supported, the contextName contained in a message is ignored when selecting an entry in the snmpProxyTable."

::= { snmpProxyEntry 4 }

snmpProxyTargetParamsIn OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpAdminString
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object selects an entry in the snmpTargetParamsTable.
The selected entry is used to determine which row of the
snmpProxyTable to use for forwarding received messages."

::= { snmpProxyEntry 5 }




Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 60]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


snmpProxySingleTargetOut OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpAdminString
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object selects a management target defined in the
snmpTargetAddrTable (in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB). The
selected target is defined by an entry in the

snmpTargetAddrTable whose index value (snmpTargetAddrName) is equal to this object.

This object is only used when selection of a single target is required (i.e. when forwarding an incoming read or write request)."

::= { snmpProxyEntry 6 }

snmpProxyMultipleTargetOut OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX SnmpTagValue
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object selects a set of management targets defined
in the snmpTargetAddrTable (in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB).


This object is only used when selection of multiple targets is required (i.e. when forwarding an incoming notification)."

::= { snmpProxyEntry 7 }

snmpProxyStorageType OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The storage type of this conceptual row.
Conceptual rows having the value 'permanent' need not
allow write-access to any columnar objects in the row."

DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { snmpProxyEntry 8 }

snmpProxyRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE

SYNTAX RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The status of this conceptual row.

To create a row in this table, a manager must



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 61]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


set this object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).

The following objects may not be modified while the value of this object is active(1):

  • snmpProxyType
  • snmpProxyContextEngineID
  • snmpProxyContextName
  • snmpProxyTargetParamsIn
  • snmpProxySingleTargetOut
  • snmpProxyMultipleTargetOut"

::= { snmpProxyEntry 9 }

--
--
-- Conformance information
--
--



snmpProxyCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=


{ snmpProxyConformance 1 }
snmpProxyGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=

{ snmpProxyConformance 2 }


--
Compliance statements


snmpProxyCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE

STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for SNMP entities which include
a proxy forwarding application."
MODULE SNMP-TARGET-MIB
MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpTargetBasicGroup,
snmpTargetResponseGroup }

MODULE -- This Module
MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpProxyGroup } ::= { snmpProxyCompliances 1 }

snmpProxyGroup OBJECT-GROUP

OBJECTS {
snmpProxyType,
snmpProxyContextEngineID, snmpProxyContextName,
snmpProxyTargetParamsIn,



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 62]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


snmpProxySingleTargetOut, snmpProxyMultipleTargetOut, snmpProxyStorageType,
snmpProxyRowStatus

}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION

"A collection of
objects providing remote configuration of
management target translation parameters for use by
proxy forwarder
applications."

::= { snmpProxyGroups 3 }

END

5. Identification of Management Targets in Notification Originators

This section describes the mechanisms used by a notification originator application when using the MIB module described in this document to determine the set of management targets to be used when generating a notification.

A notification originator uses all active entries in the snmpNotifyTable to find the management targets to be used for generating notifications. Each active entry in this table selects zero or more entries in the snmpTargetAddrTable. When a notification is generated, it is sent to all of the targets specified by the selected snmpTargetAddrTable entries (subject to the application of access control and notification filtering).

Any entry in the snmpTargetAddrTable whose snmpTargetAddrTagList object contains a tag value which is equal to a value of snmpNotifyTag is selected by the snmpNotifyEntry which contains that instance of snmpNotifyTag. Note that a particular snmpTargetAddrEntry may be selected by multiple entries in the snmpNotifyTable, resulting in multiple notifications being generated using that snmpTargetAddrEntry (this allows, for example, both traps and informs to be sent to the same target).

Each snmpTargetAddrEntry contains a pointer to the snmpTargetParamsTable (snmpTargetAddrParams). This pointer selects a set of SNMP parameters to be used for generating notifications. If the selected entry in the snmpTargetParamsTable does not exist, the management target is not used to generate notifications.

The decision as to whether a notification should contain an Unconfirmed-Class or a Confirmed-Class PDU is determined by the value of the snmpNotifyType object. If the value of this object is trap(1), the notification should contain an Unconfirmed-Class PDU.



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 63]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


If the value of this object is inform(2), then the notification should contain a Confirmed-Class PDU, and the timeout time and number of retries for the notification are the value of snmpTargetAddrTimeout and snmpTargetAddrRetryCount. Note that the exception to these rules is when the snmpTargetParamsMPModel object indicates an SNMP version which supports a different PDU version. In this case, the notification may be sent using a different PDU type ([RFC2576] defines the PDU type in the case where the outgoing SNMP version is SNMPv1).

6. Notification Filtering

This section describes the mechanisms used by a notification originator application when using the MIB module described in this document to filter generation of notifications.

A notification originator uses the snmpNotifyFilterTable to filter notifications. A notification filter profile may be associated with a particular entry in the snmpTargetParamsTable. The associated filter profile is identified by an entry in the snmpNotifyFilterProfileTable whose index is equal to the index of the entry in the snmpTargetParamsTable. If no such entry exists in the snmpNotifyFilterProfileTable, no filtering is performed for that management target.

If such an entry does exist, the value of snmpNotifyFilterProfileName of the entry is compared with the corresponding portion of the index of all active entries in the snmpNotifyFilterTable. All such entries for which this comparison results in an exact match are used for filtering a notification generated using the associated snmpTargetParamsEntry. If no such entries exist, no filtering is performed, and a notification may be sent to the management target.

Otherwise, if matching entries do exist, a notification may be sent if the NOTIFICATION-TYPE OBJECT IDENTIFIER of the notification (this is the value of the element of the variable bindings whose name is snmpTrapOID.0, i.e., the second variable binding) is specifically included, and none of the object instances to be included in the variable-bindings of the notification are specifically excluded by the matching entries.

Each set of snmpNotifyFilterTable entries is divided into two collections of filter subtrees: the included filter subtrees, and the excluded filter subtrees. The snmpNotifyFilterType object defines the collection to which each matching entry belongs.

To determine whether a particular notification name or object instance is excluded by the set of matching entries, compare the



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 64]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


notification name's or object instance's OBJECT IDENTIFIER with each of the matching entries. For a notification name, if none match, then the notification name is considered excluded, and the notification should not be sent to this management target. For an object instance, if none match, the object instance is considered included, and the notification may be sent to this management target. If one or more match, then the notification name or object instance is included or excluded, according to the value of snmpNotifyFilterType in the entry whose value of snmpNotifyFilterSubtree has the most sub-identifiers. If multiple entries match and have the same number of sub-identifiers, then the value of snmpNotifyFilterType, in the entry among those which match, and whose instance is lexicographically the largest, determines the inclusion or exclusion.

A notification name or object instance's OBJECT IDENTIFIER X matches an entry in the snmpNotifyFilterTable when the number of sub- identifiers in X is at least as many as in the value of snmpNotifyFilterSubtree for the entry, and each sub-identifier in the value of snmpNotifyFilterSubtree matches its corresponding sub- identifier in X. Two sub-identifiers match either if the corresponding bit of snmpNotifyFilterMask is zero (the 'wild card' value), or if the two sub-identifiers are equal.

7. Management Target Translation in Proxy Forwarder Applications

This section describes the mechanisms used by a proxy forwarder application when using the MIB module described in this document to translate incoming management target information into outgoing management target information for the purpose of forwarding messages. There are actually two mechanisms a proxy forwarder may use, one for forwarding request messages, and one for forwarding notification messages.

7.1. Management Target Translation for Request Forwarding

When forwarding request messages, the proxy forwarder will select a single entry in the snmpProxyTable. To select this entry, it will perform the following comparisons:

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 65]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


There may be multiple entries in the snmpProxyTable for which these comparisons succeed. The entry whose snmpProxyName has the lexicographically smallest value and for which the comparisons succeed will be selected by the proxy forwarder.

The outgoing management target information is identified by the value of the snmpProxySingleTargetOut object of the selected entry. This object identifies an entry in the snmpTargetAddrTable. The identified entry in the snmpTargetAddrTable also contains a reference to the snmpTargetParamsTable (snmpTargetAddrParams). If either the identified entry in the snmpTargetAddrTable does not exist, or the identified entry in the snmpTargetParamsTable does not exist, then this snmpProxyEntry does not identify valid forwarding information, and the proxy forwarder should attempt to identify another row.

If there is no entry in the snmpProxyTable for which all of the conditions above may be met, then there is no appropriate forwarding information, and the proxy forwarder should take appropriate actions.

Otherwise, The snmpTargetAddrTDomain, snmpTargetAddrTAddress, snmpTargetAddrTimeout, and snmpTargetRetryCount of the identified snmpTargetAddrEntry, and the snmpTargetParamsMPModel, snmpTargetParamsSecurityModel, snmpTargetParamsSecurityName, and snmpTargetParamsSecurityLevel of the identified snmpTargetParamsEntry are used as the destination management target.

7.2. Management Target Translation for Notification Forwarding

When forwarding notification messages, the proxy forwarder will select multiple entries in the snmpProxyTable. To select these entries, it will perform the following comparisons:

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 66]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


All entries for which these conditions are met are selected. The snmpProxyMultipleTargetOut object of each such entry is used to select a set of entries in the snmpTargetAddrTable. Any snmpTargetAddrEntry whose snmpTargetAddrTagList object contains a tag value equal to the value of snmpProxyMultipleTargetOut, and whose snmpTargetAddrParams object references an existing entry in the snmpTargetParamsTable, is selected as a destination for the forwarded notification.

8. Intellectual Property

The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.

The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive Director.

9. Acknowledgments

This document is the result of the efforts of the SNMPv3 Working Group. Some special thanks are in order to the following SNMPv3 WG members:

Harald Tveit Alvestrand (Maxware) Dave Battle (SNMP Research, Inc.) Alan Beard (Disney Worldwide Services) Paul Berrevoets (SWI Systemware/Halcyon Inc.)



Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 67]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Martin Bjorklund (Ericsson)
Uri Blumenthal (IBM T.J. Watson Research Center) Jeff Case (SNMP Research, Inc.) John Curran (BBN)
Mike Daniele (Compaq Computer Corporation)

  1. Max Devlin (Eltrax Systems) John Flick (Hewlett Packard) Rob Frye (MCI) Wes Hardaker (U.C.Davis, Information Technology - D.C.A.S.) David Harrington (Enterasys Networks) Lauren Heintz (BMC Software, Inc.) N.C. Hien (IBM T.J. Watson Research Center) Michael Kirkham (InterWorking Labs, Inc.) Dave Levi (Nortel Networks) Louis A Mamakos (UUNET Technologies Inc.) Joe Marzot (Nortel Networks) Paul Meyer (Secure Computing Corporation) Keith McCloghrie (Cisco Systems) Bob Moore (IBM) Russ Mundy (TIS Labs at Network Associates) Bob Natale (ACE*COMM Corporation) Mike O'Dell (UUNET Technologies Inc.) Dave Perkins (DeskTalk) Peter Polkinghorne (Brunel University) Randy Presuhn (BMC Software, Inc.) David Reeder (TIS Labs at Network Associates) David Reid (SNMP Research, Inc.) Aleksey Romanov (Quality Quorum) Shawn Routhier (Epilogue) Juergen Schoenwaelder (TU Braunschweig) Bob Stewart (Cisco Systems) Mike Thatcher (Independent Consultant) Bert Wijnen (Lucent Technologies)

The document is based on recommendations of the IETF Security and Administrative Framework Evolution for SNMP Advisory Team. Members of that Advisory Team were:

David Harrington (Enterasys Networks) Jeff Johnson (Cisco Systems)
David Levi (Nortel Networks)
John Linn (Openvision)
Russ Mundy (Trusted Information Systems) chair Shawn Routhier (Epilogue)
Glenn Waters (Nortel)
Bert Wijnen (Lucent Technologies)





Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 68]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


As recommended by the Advisory Team and the SNMPv3 Working Group Charter, the design incorporates as much as practical from previous RFCs and drafts. As a result, special thanks are due to the authors of previous designs known as SNMPv2u and SNMPv2*:

Jeff Case (SNMP Research, Inc.) David Harrington (Enterasys Networks) David Levi (Nortel Networks)
Keith McCloghrie (Cisco Systems) Brian O'Keefe (Hewlett Packard) Marshall T. Rose (Dover Beach Consulting) Jon Saperia (BGS Systems Inc.) Steve Waldbusser (International Network Services) Glenn W. Waters (Bell-Northern Research Ltd.)

10. Security Considerations

The SNMP applications described in this document typically have direct access to MIB instrumentation. Thus, it is very important that these applications be strict in their application of access control as described in this document.

In addition, there may be some types of notification generator applications which, rather than accessing MIB instrumentation using access control, will obtain MIB information through other means (such as from a command line). The implementors and users of such applications must be responsible for not divulging MIB information that normally would be inaccessible due to access control.

Finally, the MIBs described in this document contain potentially sensitive information. A security administrator may wish to limit access to these MIBs.

11. References

11.1 Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2578]
McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.
[RFC2579]
McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.

Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 69]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


[RFC2580]
McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.
[RFC3411]
Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture for describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks", STD 62, RFC 3411, December 2002.
[RFC3412]
Case, J., Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3412, December 2002.
[RFC3415]
Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R. and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3415, December 2002.
[RFC3416]
Presuhn, R., Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol Operations for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3416, December 2002.
[RFC3418]
Presuhn, R., Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Management Information Base (MIB) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3418, December 2002.

11.2 Informative References

[RFC1157]
Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M. and J. Davin, "Simple Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157, May 1990.
[RFC1213]
McCloghrie, K. and M. Rose, Editors, "Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based

internets: MIB-II", STD 17, RFC 1213, March 1991.

[RFC2576]
Frye, R.,Levi, D., Routhier, S. and B. Wijnen, "Coexistence between Version 1, Version 2, and Version 3 of the Internet-standard Network Management Framework", RFC 2576, February 1999.






Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 70]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Appendix A - Trap Configuration Example

This section describes an example configuration for a Notification Generator application which implements the snmpNotifyBasicCompliance level. The example configuration specifies that the Notification Generator should send notifications to 3 separate managers, using authentication and no privacy for the first 2 managers, and using both authentication and privacy for the third manager.

The configuration consists of three rows in the snmpTargetAddrTable, two rows in the snmpTargetTable, and two rows in the snmpNotifyTable.

*
snmpTargetAddrName
= "addr1"

snmpTargetAddrTDomain
= snmpUDPDomain

snmpTargetAddrTAddress
= 128.1.2.3/162

snmpTargetAddrTagList
= "group1"

snmpTargetAddrParams
= "AuthNoPriv-joe"

snmpTargetAddrStorageType
= readOnly(5)


snmpTargetAddrRowStatus

= active(1)

*
snmpTargetAddrName
= "addr2"

snmpTargetAddrTDomain
= snmpUDPDomain

snmpTargetAddrTAddress
= 128.2.4.6/162

snmpTargetAddrTagList
= "group1"

snmpTargetAddrParams
= "AuthNoPriv-joe"

snmpTargetAddrStorageType
= readOnly(5)


snmpTargetAddrRowStatus

= active(1)

*
snmpTargetAddrName
= "addr3"

snmpTargetAddrTDomain
= snmpUDPDomain

snmpTargetAddrTAddress
= 128.1.5.9/162

snmpTargetAddrTagList
= "group2"

snmpTargetAddrParams
= "AuthPriv-bob"

snmpTargetAddrStorageType
= readOnly(5)


snmpTargetAddrRowStatus

= active(1)

*
snmpTargetParamsName
= "AuthNoPriv-joe"

snmpTargetParamsMPModel
= 3

snmpTargetParamsSecurityModel = 3 (USM)

snmpTargetParamsSecurityName = "joe"

snmpTargetParamsSecurityLevel = authNoPriv(2)

snmpTargetParamsStorageType = readOnly(5)

snmpTargetParamsRowStatus
= active(1)








Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 71]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


*
snmpTargetParamsName = "AuthPriv-bob"
snmpTargetParamsMPModel = 3
snmpTargetParamsSecurityModel = 3 (USM)
snmpTargetParamsSecurityName = "bob"
snmpTargetParamsSecurityLevel = authPriv(3)
snmpTargetParamsStorageType = readOnly(5)
snmpTargetParamsRowStatus = active(1)
*
snmpNotifyName = "group1"
snmpNotifyTag = "group1"
snmpNotifyType = trap(1)
snmpNotifyStorageType = readOnly(5)
snmpNotifyRowStatus = active(1)
*
snmpNotifyName = "group2"
snmpNotifyTag = "group2"
snmpNotifyType = trap(1)
snmpNotifyStorageType = readOnly(5)
snmpNotifyRowStatus = active(1)

These entries define two groups of management targets. The first group contains two management targets:



first target
second target
messageProcessingModel
SNMPv3
SNMPv3

securityModel
3 (USM)
3 (USM)

securityName
"joe"
"joe"

securityLevel
authNoPriv(2)
authNoPriv(2)

transportDomain
snmpUDPDomain
snmpUDPDomain

transportAddress
128.1.2.3/162
128.2.4.6/162

And the second group contains a single management target:

messageProcessingModel SNMPv3

securityLevel authPriv(3) securityModel 3 (USM) securityName "bob" transportDomain snmpUDPDomain transportAddress 128.1.5.9/162











Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 72]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Editors' Addresses

David B. Levi
Nortel Networks
3505 Kesterwood Drive
Knoxville, TN 37918
U.S.A.

Phone: +1 865 686 0432

EMail: dlevi@nortelnetworks.com


Paul Meyer
Secure Computing Corporation
2675 Long Lake Road
Roseville, MN 55113
U.S.A.

Phone: +1 651 628 1592

EMail: paul_meyer@securecomputing.com


Bob Stewart
Retired



























Levi, et. al.
Standards Track
[Page 73]
RFC 3413
SNMP Applications
December 2002


Full Copyright Statement

Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.

This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English.

The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.



















Levi, et. al. Standards Track [Page 74]